天晉 海天晉 The Wings & Ocean Wings 業主討論區's Archiver

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-17 22:23

奇洛_新鴻基_回信(投票)

各位Ching,感謝大家的回复。大家太客氣了,我亦是為了自己的利益而已。
我想做一個簡單投票,看看大家偏向接受SHK或是要繼續更進。麻煩大家按一下,謝謝!

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-18 11:13

[i=s] 本帖最後由 Wings3A_w 於 2017-1-19 03:07 編輯 [/i]

推一推這個投票!
要了解背後故事請到:
[url]http://www.thewingshk.com/redirect.php?tid=3370&goto=lastpost#lastpost[/url]

JeKi 發表於 2017-1-19 12:06

我覺得SHK 起天晉3A 遲左51 日 最少都要減返D 管理費LA

fung 發表於 2017-1-20 00:51

[b]回復 [url=http://www.thewingshk.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=41410&ptid=3372]3#[/url] [i]JeKi[/i] [/b]


    Agree! Should at least have some compensation on the management fee.

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-20 21:41

感謝大家的參與!這個匿名投票暫時顯示超過90%的業主不滿意SHK的回复,希望繼續更進。我在這裡總結一下大家的意願:

下一步:
問Authorised Person關於延遲51天的理據
找傳媒

要求:
SHK代繳一部份管理費

Paul 發表於 2017-1-21 23:38

May this include 3B please although the elay is not 51 days

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-21 23:38

各Ching,我正在更新之前寫的稿,加強理據,再發給傳媒及認可人士。希望大家可以幫忙。 SHK在回復中提到各屋苑的規模有別,所以進度不一樣。但是規模這東西一開始就知道,在算關鍵日期是應已有預期。這點是可以斟酌的。

大家可否知道各屋苑動工的日期?謝謝!

[attach]9136[/attach]

Paul 發表於 2017-1-21 23:38

Voted

s23480 發表於 2017-1-22 01:02

如果SHK話既然係匿名投票,咁點可以肯定投票的人一定是業主,你們諗住點回應?

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-22 01:35

[b]回復 [url=http://www.thewingshk.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=41466&ptid=3372]9#[/url] [i]s23480[/i] [/b]

這投票並非用來對SHK證明有多少業主支持繼續爭取,而只是樣我們自己知道大家大概的意向。

catherinesmile 發表於 2017-1-23 14:43

[quote]各Ching,我正在更新之前寫的稿,加強理據,再發給傳媒及認可人士。希望大家可以幫忙。 SHK在回復中提到各 ...
[size=2][color=#999999]Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-21 23:38[/color] [url=http://www.thewingshk.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=41459&ptid=3372][img]http://www.thewingshk.com/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]


Wings3A_w 師兄
唔知呢D資訊有無幫助~
Ref: Search by Google

[attach]9144[/attach]

YNWA 發表於 2017-1-23 16:18

[quote]Wings3A_w 師兄
唔知呢D資訊有無幫助~
Ref: Search by Google
[size=2][color=#999999]catherinesmile 發表於 2017-1-23 14:43[/color] [url=http://thewingshk.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=41530&ptid=3372][img]http://thewingshk.com/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]

Thanks!!

我相信用technical issue講唔贏新地,如果用同期樓盤的開工日期和交樓日期要新地解釋,這是比較客觀。

天文台網頁有齊過去的inclement weather警告的開始和取消信號的時間,也可以做參考

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-23 20:21

多謝多謝!
我在整理這些資料中!

YNWA 發表於 2017-1-23 20:36

我已從天文台網頁將2013至16的黃紅黑暴雨警告、3/8/9/10颱風信號的日子放進Excel, 請問有沒有什麼時候動工和平頂的日子,可以按這期間計出所謂的inclement weather的日數

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-23 21:37

[b]回復 [url=http://www.thewingshk.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=41538&ptid=3372]14#[/url] [i]YNWA[/i] [/b]

Please check PM, thank you

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-25 14:26

This is a construction of a response to the letter of SHK. Please see for your comments, thank you.

1. The difference in scale and size of the 4 properties is not relevant since this was already reflected in determining the construction period. The Wings IIIA has a longer construction period than all the other 4 properties because its scale is larger.

2. The number of days of inclement weather that is common to all 4 properties is 81 days. Assuming SHK has the same competence as other developers, it could still progress during that time. The number of days of inclement weather that is not common to the properties but specific to The Wings IIIA alone is only 30 days, so why is there a 51 day delay?

3. This leads to the thinking that inclement weather is not the sole blame for the delay. Perhaps it is the lack of manpower to the site, error in construction, etc.

[attach]9145[/attach]

lok0022 發表於 2017-1-25 19:14

[quote]This is a construction of a response to the letter of SHK. Please see for your comments, thank you.
...
[size=2][color=#999999]Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-25 14:26[/color] [url=http://www.thewingshk.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=41572&ptid=3372][img]http://www.thewingshk.com/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]


    佩服,將來屋苑管理費條數靠你監察了,加油!

catherinesmile 發表於 2017-1-25 22:54

[b]回復 [url=http://www.thewingshk.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=41572&ptid=3372]16#[/url] [i]Wings3A_w[/i] [/b]

Thanks for your time Wings3A_w 師兄!
辛苦了~

hkppl 發表於 2017-1-25 23:08

[i=s] 本帖最後由 hkppl 於 2017-1-25 23:14 編輯 [/i]

首先多謝Wings3A_W的努力。
多口加句個人意見
你可否將天晉3A進度update內的第#3443
照片(拆卸改工後但尚未修復的露台)
傳給發展商。看他們會有什麼解釋一個全新
建築的樓盤為何會這樣。是否這工序出錯了而
導致延遲。

謝謝

Wings3A_w 發表於 2017-1-26 23:28

[b]回復 [url=http://www.thewingshk.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=41582&ptid=3372]19#[/url] [i]hkppl[/i] [/b]


    好提議,謝謝

charlotte 發表於 2017-2-21 01:14

厲害

tli3888 發表於 2017-3-31 17:28

I just a new member joining this forum, I really appreciate Wings3A_w and other member effort, the delay is unreasonable especially in comparison with other development nearby, we should strike for it, support all of you.

Shkxxx 發表於 2017-3-31 19:16

[i=s] 本帖最後由 Shkxxx 於 2017-4-1 03:44 編輯 [/i]

本港法例付予發展商雨水期作後盾,明知係發展商有問題有錯,都冇得搞!

cwlee 發表於 2017-4-1 11:07

大家仲記唔記得地盤曾火燭,有人仲話聽到爆炸聲呢單嘢?

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.2  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.